Skip to content

Q2 FY27 Earnings Results

#CompanyProfit (₹ Cr)SectorRevenue (₹ Cr)Profit (₹ Cr)
🥇 RELIANCE Reliance Industries Ltd29,550Energy3,32,86129,550
🥈 SBIN State Bank of India25,741Financial Services—25,741
🥉 IOC Indian Oil Corporation Ltd22,503Energy2,68,03922,503
4 HDFCBANK HDFC Bank Ltd20,700Banks—20,700
5 ICICIBANK ICICI Bank Ltd17,312Banks—17,312
6 TCS Tata Consultancy Services Ltd13,934Information Technology73,18813,934
7 JPL Jio Platforms8,387—40,4758,387
8 INFY Infosys Ltd7,838Information Technology49,2447,838
9 PFC Power Finance Corporation Ltd7,682Financial Services29,0447,682
10 AXISBANK Axis Bank Ltd7,650Financial Services—7,650
11 NTPC NTPC Ltd7,351Utilities54,2707,351
12 ADANIPOWER Adani Power Ltd7,019Power19,4397,019
13 BANKBARODA Bank of Baroda6,639Banks—6,639
14 COALINDIA Coal India Ltd6,547Energy44,1796,547
15 HINDZINC Hindustan Zinc Ltd6,412Commodities15,0936,412
16 BAJFINANCE Bajaj Finance Ltd6,367Financial Services24,5466,367
17 VEDL Vedanta Ltd6,202Metals & Mining26,3566,202
18 VAML Vedanta Aluminium Metal Ltd6,187Metals & Mining22,3246,187
19 BAJAJFINSV Bajaj Finserv Ltd5,952Financial Services43,4165,952
20 LT Larsen & Toubro Ltd5,949Industrials78,7505,949
21 KOTAKBANK Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd5,634Financial Services—5,634
22 UNIONBANK Union Bank of India5,570Banks—5,570
23 PNB Punjab National Bank5,561Banks—5,561
24 JSWSTEEL JSW Steel Ltd5,359Commodities54,4865,359
25 CANBK Canara Bank5,182Banks—5,182

About the Q2 FY27 leaderboard

What does the Q2 FY27 earnings leaderboard rank?
Companies ranked on one measure at a time — EPS surprise against consensus, profit growth, revenue growth, or absolute profit and revenue. Ranking is computed over every company that reported the quarter, not just the ones on the first page of the grid.
Which companies can appear in the EPS surprise ranking?
Surprise is measured against an analyst estimate, and only 243 companies had one for Q2 FY27. A company nobody covers has no surprise to report, so it sorts below every company that does rather than being ranked at zero — in practice the ranking is filled by covered companies.
Is a large percentage growth figure always a good result?
No. A company recovering from a very small base can post several hundred percent growth on a modest absolute gain, which is why absolute revenue and profit are shown beside the growth figure. Growth measured from a loss-making base is excluded entirely rather than published as a large number.
Why do some Q2 FY27 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No, and the denominator matters. An analyst consensus existed for 243 of the 1,325 companies that reported Q2 FY27 — 18.3%. Beat, missed and in-line describe only those. Every other company is marked "no estimate" rather than being counted as in line, because nobody forecast it. Revenue and profit growth, by contrast, cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.