Skip to content

Q1 FY27 Earnings Results

Strongest Transport Services +75.0%

Weakest Transport −19.1%

Most reporters Financial Services 582

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services582+18.3%+16.2%
18 / 4 / 4 of 26 covered
Industrial Products351+17.9%+26.4%
7 / 10 / 2 of 19 covered
Commercial Services332+6.8%−5.1%
4 / 2 / 0 of 6 covered
Consumer Goods306+13.6%+14.1%
24 / 14 / 3 of 41 covered
Textiles279+6.9%+17.0%
3 / 4 / 0 of 7 covered
Chemicals275+17.5%+33.3%
8 / 3 / 0 of 11 covered
Information Technology259+14.3%+11.7%
12 / 16 / 3 of 31 covered
Capital Goods226+18.9%+11.6%
5 / 11 / 0 of 16 covered
Healthcare222+15.9%+18.2%
19 / 9 / 4 of 32 covered
Construction174+7.7%−3.3%
12 / 7 / 3 of 22 covered
Automobiles172+20.4%+15.7%
20 / 10 / 1 of 31 covered
Realty150+6.7%+4.7%
3 / 7 / 0 of 10 covered
Consumer Discretionary142+22.7%+30.8%
5 / 1 / 0 of 6 covered
Food Products95+16.3%+14.6%
2 / 2 / 1 of 5 covered
Industrials93+14.1%+15.5%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Media92+9.9%−0.9%
2 / 2 / 0 of 4 covered
Leisure Services92+12.9%+18.2%
6 / 7 / 0 of 13 covered
FMCG87+15.0%+19.0%
2 / 0 / 0 of 2 covered
Metals & Mining83+25.1%+33.3%
4 / 2 / 1 of 7 covered
Services66+19.9%+12.3%
1 / 1 / 1 of 3 covered
Capital Markets59+22.4%+19.2%
1 / 2 / 0 of 3 covered
Retail55+14.2%+17.1%
8 / 11 / 1 of 20 covered
Healthcare Services54+20.1%+22.4%
1 / 6 / 1 of 8 covered
Logistics & Cargo54+12.3%+12.0%
2 / 2 / 1 of 5 covered
Forest Materials52+10.1%+32.2%no analyst coverage
Commodities52+9.8%+4.8%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Banks38—+34.9%
9 / 1 / 1 of 11 covered
Power37+14.2%+11.0%
3 / 5 / 0 of 8 covered
Telecom37+10.7%+22.1%
1 / 1 / 1 of 3 covered
Consumer Services29+3.9%+4.6%
1 / 1 / 0 of 2 covered
Fast Moving Consumer Goods27+16.3%+36.5%
1 / 1 / 1 of 3 covered
Oil & Gas27+32.1%+9.1%
2 / 1 / 1 of 4 covered
Aerospace & Defense24+35.1%+26.7%
3 / 2 / 0 of 5 covered
Utilities24+20.1%+12.9%
1 / 1 / 0 of 2 covered
Beverages22+15.3%+11.0%
2 / 0 / 1 of 3 covered
Diversified17+9.3%+30.9%no analyst coverage
Petroleum Products14+40.0%+42.5%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
Energy13+14.8%+4.9%
4 / 0 / 0 of 4 covered
Transport Services12+29.7%+75.0%no analyst coverage
Transport12+14.5%−19.1%no analyst coverage
Insurance11+13.2%+20.0%
2 / 4 / 0 of 6 covered
Telecommunication6−28.4%+392.6%no analyst coverage
Engineering Services2+93.7%+470.4%no analyst coverage
Trading2+42.5%+28.2%no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners2+5.4%−13.6%no analyst coverage
Aviation2+22.3%+50.0%no analyst coverage
Cables1+126.9%+289.6%no analyst coverage
Consumer Durables1+118.5%+285.7%no analyst coverage
Education1−2.4%−14.4%no analyst coverage
Packaging1+24.7%+77.9%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+3.5%−17.5%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment1+57.8%+77.1%no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+21.0%+37.0%no analyst coverage
Steel1+3.5%−19.8%no analyst coverage

About Q1 FY27 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q1 FY27?
On median profit growth, Transport Services led and Transport lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q1 FY27 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No, and the denominator matters. An analyst consensus existed for 382 of the 4,797 companies that reported Q1 FY27 — 8.0%. Beat, missed and in-line describe only those. Every other company is marked "no estimate" rather than being counted as in line, because nobody forecast it. Revenue and profit growth, by contrast, cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.