Q3 FY26 Earnings

Quarterly results for Indian listed companies · Oct–Dec 2025 · quarter ended 31 Dec 2025

Strongest Automobiles +28.1%

Weakest Media -34.5%

Most reporters Financial Services 594

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services594+8.9%+8.0%
10 / 10 / 4 of 24 covered
Commercial Services306-0.1%-16.7%
4 / 0 / 0 of 4 covered
Consumer Discretionary302+6.5%-4.8%
10 / 22 / 0 of 32 covered
Industrial Products294+6.9%+9.4%
5 / 8 / 1 of 14 covered
Consumer Goods257+9.9%+7.8%
9 / 15 / 2 of 26 covered
Information Technology257+10.6%0.0%
4 / 24 / 0 of 28 covered
Chemicals237+6.8%-1.6%
1 / 1 / 1 of 3 covered
Textiles236-0.8%-17.5%
0 / 1 / 1 of 2 covered
Healthcare235+10.8%+5.3%
8 / 15 / 2 of 25 covered
Industrials216+12.8%+0.5%
2 / 6 / 0 of 8 covered
Capital Goods187+15.1%+12.1%
3 / 5 / 1 of 9 covered
Automobiles142+16.3%+28.1%
7 / 12 / 3 of 22 covered
Realty142+1.6%-5.3%
4 / 5 / 0 of 9 covered
Construction139+6.2%+8.7%
4 / 12 / 0 of 16 covered
Commodities127+4.7%0.0%
1 / 5 / 0 of 6 covered
Services112+8.3%-5.1%
5 / 0 / 0 of 5 covered
Food Products85+14.0%+11.8%
4 / 1 / 0 of 5 covered
FMCG83+11.5%+3.6%
1 / 2 / 1 of 4 covered
Media77+1.4%-34.5%
1 / 1 / 0 of 2 covered
Metals & Mining74+9.5%+3.5%
1 / 2 / 0 of 3 covered
Leisure Services73+7.1%-3.1%
3 / 2 / 0 of 5 covered
Fast Moving Consumer Goods71+3.8%-4.1%
0 / 3 / 1 of 4 covered
Capital Markets55+7.4%+4.0%
2 / 0 / 0 of 2 covered
Healthcare Services48+17.6%+10.8%
4 / 5 / 0 of 9 covered
Retail47+13.4%+11.3%
6 / 8 / 2 of 16 covered
Forest Materials47+5.2%-24.9%no analyst coverage
Logistics & Cargo44+9.3%-3.8%
2 / 3 / 0 of 5 covered
Power33+6.6%-0.5%
3 / 1 / 0 of 4 covered
Banks32+12.8%
8 / 2 / 1 of 11 covered
Oil & Gas28+7.7%+15.2%
2 / 3 / 1 of 6 covered
Utilities26+6.1%+5.8%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
Telecom26+4.3%-8.6%
3 / 0 / 0 of 3 covered
Aerospace & Defense22+23.6%+14.7%
4 / 1 / 0 of 5 covered
Consumer Services22+9.5%-20.4%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Beverages16+9.5%+3.8%no analyst coverage
Diversified15+8.3%-7.6%no analyst coverage
Telecommunication15+7.5%-23.3%no analyst coverage
Petroleum Products14+8.4%+1.6%
2 / 2 / 0 of 4 covered
Transport13+11.0%-2.6%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
Energy12-8.1%+18.9%
0 / 2 / 0 of 2 covered
Insurance11+28.1%-0.7%
2 / 4 / 0 of 6 covered
Transport Services6-4.1%-147.0%no analyst coverage
Aviation3+6.2%-34.2%
0 / 1 / 0 of 1 covered
Engineering Services2+20.2%-75.0%no analyst coverage
Cables1+56.7%+666.7%no analyst coverage
Steel1+1.9%-18.7%no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners1-23.9%-85.2%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+6.3%-15.7%no analyst coverage
Consumer Durables1+1,957.1%+1,050.0%no analyst coverage
Trading1-1.8%+14.1%no analyst coverage
Packaging1-1.5%+31.7%no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+36.9%+28.4%no analyst coverage
Education1+70.4%+35.7%no analyst coverage

About Q3 FY26 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q3 FY26?
On median profit growth, Automobiles led and Media lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q3 FY26 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No, and the denominator matters. An analyst consensus existed for 333 of the 5,039 companies that reported Q3 FY26 — 6.6%. Beat, missed and in-line describe only those. Every other company is marked "no estimate" rather than being counted as in line, because nobody forecast it. Revenue and profit growth, by contrast, cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.