Skip to content

Q3 FY26 Earnings Results

Strongest Fast Moving Consumer Goods +23.2%

Weakest Consumer Services −36.6%

Most reporters Financial Services 582

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services582+9.1%+6.7%
9 / 9 / 5 of 23 covered
Industrial Products349+7.9%+9.8%
7 / 11 / 1 of 19 covered
Commercial Services338+1.7%−14.4%
7 / 0 / 0 of 7 covered
Consumer Goods304+9.9%+10.2%
16 / 23 / 2 of 41 covered
Textiles280−1.0%−17.8%
0 / 2 / 1 of 3 covered
Chemicals277+6.0%0.0%
4 / 6 / 1 of 11 covered
Information Technology258+10.6%−0.5%
3 / 24 / 0 of 27 covered
Capital Goods228+16.4%+12.2%
5 / 10 / 0 of 15 covered
Healthcare220+10.6%+2.5%
10 / 16 / 2 of 28 covered
Construction175+7.7%+14.9%
6 / 16 / 0 of 22 covered
Automobiles174+16.1%+22.4%
7 / 17 / 3 of 27 covered
Realty154+1.8%−6.2%
4 / 6 / 0 of 10 covered
Consumer Discretionary118+4.0%−8.9%
2 / 4 / 0 of 6 covered
Leisure Services94+8.2%−3.6%
3 / 8 / 0 of 11 covered
Media94−0.2%−28.1%
1 / 3 / 0 of 4 covered
Food Products92+14.0%+11.8%
3 / 1 / 0 of 4 covered
FMCG90+11.5%0.0%
0 / 1 / 1 of 2 covered
Metals & Mining80+9.1%+1.9%
0 / 3 / 0 of 3 covered
Industrials76−10.1%−31.6%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Services63+6.6%−5.1%
0 / 2 / 0 of 2 covered
Capital Markets60+8.1%+2.6%
3 / 0 / 0 of 3 covered
Retail56+13.3%+10.1%
8 / 8 / 2 of 18 covered
Healthcare Services55+17.6%+15.2%
4 / 4 / 0 of 8 covered
Logistics & Cargo55+8.3%−3.8%
4 / 3 / 0 of 7 covered
Forest Materials54+2.4%−21.4%no analyst coverage
Commodities48−5.1%−0.3%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Banks38—+14.9%
9 / 3 / 1 of 13 covered
Power37+7.8%+0.5%
2 / 2 / 0 of 4 covered
Telecom37+7.3%−16.3%
3 / 0 / 0 of 3 covered
Fast Moving Consumer Goods29+5.7%+23.2%
2 / 1 / 0 of 3 covered
Consumer Services28+8.8%−36.6%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Oil & Gas28+7.7%+15.2%
2 / 2 / 1 of 5 covered
Aerospace & Defense24+23.2%+15.2%
4 / 2 / 0 of 6 covered
Utilities22+6.1%+7.0%
1 / 1 / 0 of 2 covered
Beverages22+5.6%+3.8%
0 / 2 / 1 of 3 covered
Diversified17+7.4%−13.2%no analyst coverage
Petroleum Products14+10.9%+18.9%
1 / 0 / 0 of 1 covered
Insurance12+21.9%−2.1%
2 / 6 / 0 of 8 covered
Transport12+8.9%−13.9%no analyst coverage
Transport Services12+17.5%+3.5%no analyst coverage
Energy12−4.9%+9.6%
1 / 3 / 0 of 4 covered
Telecommunication5+0.3%−100.0%no analyst coverage
Aviation3+4.8%−588.0%no analyst coverage
Engineering Services2+20.2%−75.0%no analyst coverage
Trading2+47.9%+14.1%no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners2+31.0%−15.5%no analyst coverage
Steel1+1.9%−18.7%no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+36.9%+28.4%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment1−2.4%+68.8%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+6.3%−15.7%no analyst coverage
Packaging1−1.5%+31.7%no analyst coverage
Education1+70.4%+35.7%no analyst coverage
Cables1+56.7%+666.7%no analyst coverage
Consumer Durables1+1,957.1%+1,050.0%no analyst coverage

About Q3 FY26 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q3 FY26?
On median profit growth, Fast Moving Consumer Goods led and Consumer Services lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q3 FY26 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No, and the denominator matters. An analyst consensus existed for 356 of the 4,770 companies that reported Q3 FY26 — 7.5%. Beat, missed and in-line describe only those. Every other company is marked "no estimate" rather than being counted as in line, because nobody forecast it. Revenue and profit growth, by contrast, cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.