Skip to content

Q2 FY25 Earnings Results

Strongest Capital Markets +45.9%

Weakest Industrials −50.0%

Most reporters Financial Services 598

median profit growth · strongest and weakest consider sectors with 10+ reporters

SectorReportedMedian sales YoYMedian profit YoYBeat / missed / in line
Financial Services598+19.4%+12.3%no analyst coverage
Industrial Products450+5.1%+7.5%no analyst coverage
Commercial Services388+13.6%0.0%no analyst coverage
Consumer Goods354+6.1%0.0%no analyst coverage
Textiles316+8.2%+1.8%no analyst coverage
Chemicals307+7.5%+1.4%no analyst coverage
Information Technology299+9.4%+7.5%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods284+11.5%+20.2%no analyst coverage
Healthcare252+7.1%+7.9%no analyst coverage
Construction211−1.7%−16.8%no analyst coverage
Automobiles191+7.4%+6.3%no analyst coverage
Realty172+8.5%+2.7%no analyst coverage
Consumer Discretionary130−5.3%−27.9%no analyst coverage
Media120−2.2%−25.2%no analyst coverage
Food Products115+9.0%0.0%no analyst coverage
Leisure Services112+8.7%+7.1%no analyst coverage
FMCG110+9.1%+16.2%no analyst coverage
Metals & Mining92+11.2%+20.0%no analyst coverage
Logistics & Cargo85+12.6%+3.6%no analyst coverage
Industrials78−18.9%−50.0%no analyst coverage
Retail72+12.0%+21.6%no analyst coverage
Services68+2.1%−5.7%no analyst coverage
Capital Markets63+36.4%+45.9%no analyst coverage
Healthcare Services62+13.5%+23.5%no analyst coverage
Forest Materials60−0.9%−23.1%no analyst coverage
Commodities51−13.5%−20.0%no analyst coverage
Telecom41+10.1%+4.3%no analyst coverage
Power41−0.3%+5.1%no analyst coverage
Consumer Services41+11.4%−4.6%no analyst coverage
Banks38—+20.1%no analyst coverage
Fast Moving Consumer Goods33−2.2%−14.3%no analyst coverage
Utilities31+16.8%+18.1%no analyst coverage
Oil & Gas28+11.1%+1.5%no analyst coverage
Beverages25+11.9%+8.0%no analyst coverage
Aerospace & Defense25+35.6%+31.7%no analyst coverage
Petroleum Products19+4.4%−33.3%no analyst coverage
Diversified17+6.8%−3.2%no analyst coverage
Energy14+1.3%−2.8%no analyst coverage
Transport Services14+7.5%−31.2%no analyst coverage
Transport12+11.3%−18.5%no analyst coverage
Insurance12+17.3%+6.4%no analyst coverage
Aviation4−9.0%+350.0%no analyst coverage
Telecommunication4+24.9%+6,305.9%no analyst coverage
Trading2−11.0%−33.4%no analyst coverage
Castings, Forgings & Fastners2+35.4%+49.9%no analyst coverage
Engineering Services2+3.0%−300.0%no analyst coverage
Telecomm Equipment & Infra Services1+225.0%+300.0%no analyst coverage
Cables1+233.3%+100.0%no analyst coverage
Capital Goods - Electrical Equipment1+132.4%+259.4%no analyst coverage
Education1+2.4%−2.6%no analyst coverage
Printing & Stationery1+2.6%+13.9%no analyst coverage
Diamond, Gems and Jewellery1+12.5%—no analyst coverage
Consumer Durables1——no analyst coverage
Steel1+13.5%−6.8%no analyst coverage
Packaging1+30.8%+121.4%no analyst coverage

About Q2 FY25 sector data

Which sectors performed best in Q2 FY25?
On median profit growth, Capital Markets led and Industrials lagged among sectors with at least ten companies reporting. The table below ranks every sector on median revenue and profit growth alongside its beat/miss split.
Why the median and not the average?
A single company swinging from a small loss to a small profit can produce a four-figure growth percentage, and an average would let that one row define the whole sector. The median describes the typical company in the group, which is the question a sector view is actually asked.
Why do sectors with few companies get excluded from the strongest and weakest?
A sector where three companies reported has a median that can move on one result. The strongest and weakest labels only consider sectors with ten or more reporters, so the ranking reflects a trend rather than an accident.
Why do some Q2 FY25 growth figures show "n/a" instead of a percentage?
Growth is left blank whenever the comparison period was not profitable. A percentage change measured from a loss is arithmetic without meaning — a swing from a ₹10 crore loss to a ₹10 crore profit is not "200% growth", and publishing it as such would flatter the company. The reported figures for both periods are still shown, so the change is there to read directly.
Does the beat/miss verdict cover every company?
No analyst consensus was available for Q2 FY25, so no beat/miss verdict is shown. Revenue and profit growth are taken from reported results and cover every company in the table.
What counts as an in-line result rather than a beat or a miss?
Reported earnings per share within ±2% of the consensus estimate. The band is set there because a tighter one classifies rounding as news, and a wider one swallows surprises that genuinely moved a stock.
Are the figures consolidated or standalone?
Consolidated where a company reports on that basis, standalone otherwise, with all money in ₹ crore. Figures are as filed by the company with the exchanges (NSE/BSE); they are not restated or adjusted.

Figures are as reported by companies in their quarterly filings to the exchanges (NSE/BSE), in ₹ crore. Consolidated results are shown where a company reports them, otherwise standalone. Year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth is omitted where the comparison period was loss-making, since a percentage change from a negative base is not meaningful. Analyst consensus is an estimate, not a forecast of outcome.